Marc l: The Artist
Born
in Montreal and raised on a steady diet of technology and sci-fi, Adornato
spent much of his childhood in Saudi Arabia and other foreign lands (his
father, an engineer, was frequently relocated). Adornato feels these youthful
experiences opened his mind to the world—and to what might become
of it:
“The future and emerging technologies were always big interests
of mine. I’ve embraced new ideas and concepts for technology rather
than fear them. In 1996, British scientists announced that they had cloned
a sheep. I told my dad, and discussed it with most of my friends but no
one really believed it… or perhaps wanted to believe it. That irked
me a little.”
Why did it irk him?
“Here was a scientific/technological achievement [with the potential
to] change the very fabric of humanity and our existence as a species
forever, and people brushed it off. The immensely positive applications
were so breathtaking and awe inspiring, as were its negative applications
so controversial and dangerous. I couldn’t believe that no one wanted
to get into debates about it.”
With so few cloning conversants at hand, Adornato sought to explore the
topic and spark debates through his artwork. Early on he sketched and
sculpted visions of man merged with technology, or man merged with animals,
or animals merged with animals. When video became his chief medium, the
subject matter evolved with it. A few of his many projects include “Genetic
Experiments” (2000)—short depictions of a Cyclops and other
digitally altered human heads; “Genome 2001”—a remix
video collage of technological evolution at the turn of the millennium;
“The Clone Show” (2002—a remarkably edited depiction
of Adornato interviewing his sharp-witted genetic twin.
Much like the multi-versioned man, Adornato’s work is paradoxical—at
once funny and frightening, exciting and disturbing, revelational and
apocalyptic. One moment the artist offers low-brow parody, the next he
poses philosophical inquiries on the essence of humanity. Somehow it all
comes together, but the viewer is left with a vague feeling of unease.
“I’d like to see everyone happy all the time, pleasant to
each other, helpful, kind, and good spirited—a Utopia. But, that’s
not gonna happen… So I also like to freak people out. Show them
stuff that they never thought they’d see, shock them, leave them
in awe… I’m talking about science and technology stuff, like
glowing cloned monkeys, video of a human ear graphed onto a mouse’s
back, or a man who can control his prosthetic arm just by thinking about
it… that stuff is shocking—and awesome. That’s what
art should do to viewers, leave them awe-struck, jaw hanging open. That’s
the reaction I truly strive for with all my work.”
Evidence of Adornato
(a) In Human Hybrid #1,
2, Grant Wood’s iconic American Gothic becomes something
else again. (b) Mabus makes an impromptu campaign appearance
in Mabus: Tales for the Future, Episode 3: Vote Mabus 2000. (c)
The artist meets a cheeky version of himself in The Clone Show (2002).
(d) Adornato reports that men have a generally positive
reaction to Human Hybrid #3 (Baby), but women don’t like
it much. (e) In State of the Union – Remix
(2003), George W. Bush receives a lot of applause for saying next
to nothing.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Marc IV: The Cloner
Though
he often employs humour in his work, Adornato clearly understands that
cloning and genetic engineering are problematic issues, controversial
and fraught with unknowns. Indeed, the uncertainty is a large part of
what intrigues him.
“I began to research the ideas… and became enthralled with
all the types of reproductive technologies, genetic research and manipulation
(in plants and animals) and history that surrounded the subject. Not just
in sci-fi, but in real world history. You didn’t have to go back
far to find that cloning, genetic manipulation, and creating a ‘supreme
race of beings’ wasn’t just plastered into the realm of sci-fi,
but was very real during World War II.”
“And what about all the positive uses: developing new bio-steels
and organic materials, renewable and reusable resources, reviving extinct
animals, speeding up the growth process of trees and vegetation, cleaning
up the environment, feeding the hungry, curing diseases?”
To the many people who try to reel in his enthusiasm by declaring that
humans will never be allowed to clone humans, Adornato has one question:
Who will stop them?
“Who will stop that mad scientist in his basement laboratory in
the Middle East, or Asia, or some other country with relaxed standards
on human reproduction? No one will… and bad things are bound to
happen. What will happen when they do begin to make these beings of selective
genes? Human-animal hybrids. Improved beings. Will we be able to tell
them apart from natural beings? Unlikely.”
“I’m not claiming to have answers about this reproductive
thing, or how humans will deal with it, nor am I an expert on any of this
stuff… I’m just a simple artist who frequently thinks, and
goes for long, long walks, outside of the box.” |
Marc ll: The Actor
Adornato
is very much a showman. As a songwriter and musician in his band, The
Clones, Adornato has performed all over Canada, including appearances
on “The Tom Green Show,” City TV, the New RO and Rogers 22.
He has won numerous video and audio grants and competitions. He knows
the power of self-promotion, yet his most significant “performance
art” achievement involves a deliberate masking of his identity—a
temporary shedding of all Marc Adornatos.
“I developed a performance character, ‘Mabus,’ where
I dress up in a white NASA jumpsuit with a gasmask on, and run around
town, usually during protests or very public occasions, and film it. Then
later I’ll shoot dialogue scenes, and edit it all together with
epic music and subtitles.”
“I’m not recognizable—and I usually get dressed and
undressed in secret, so that few observers know it’s me. That’s
the way I want to keep it when it comes to my performance art.”
Mabus is a scary scientific revolutionary and a politician to boot. He
is leader of the “None of the Above Party” and he very much
wants your vote. The character’s mystery and anonymity give Adornato
an effective means to create the awe-struck reaction he covets.
“It is very intimidating and bewildering to be confronted with someone
wearing a mask, specifically a gas mask… And if the face beneath
the mask is known, it would lose some of it’s intrigue.... Indeed,
if the viewer is confused about who I am, or about whether the performance
is real, the reaction can be very different. That is also why I perform
on camera. For me, part of the art is to document that unrehearsed reaction
of the public.”
Witnessing the viewer’s reaction is key for Adornato. Based on his
anecdotes, he clearly enjoys being present when his work is screened.
And he’s not satisfied with anything less than shock and awe.
“I think that if the audience hated my stuff, or was dead silent
through a video, or I saw that they were impartial or confused, or pretending
to make me feel better… I’d start to cry, then give up, and
move on to something else.. It is critical that I have the viewer’s
attention, capture their interest, their focus, and their imagination.”
“One of the biggest reasons I use mainstream
media is because it is constantly pumped in my face. I only have 50 channels
on TV, and none of them are what I want.”
Marc III: The Re-visionary
Most
of Adornato’s videos are “remix” projects: the kind
that manipulate and reinterpret pre-existing footage such as television
news broadcasts to present something totally new, usually subversive and
often laced with irony.
In the voiceover for his My Alternative video, Adornato recalled
his initial reaction to the remix form:
“It was not only a tremendous sensation to defy convention, but
when copyright infringement was no longer a deterrent for my expression,
I truly felt a freedom to express my opinion like I had never felt before.”
In State of the Union – Remix, Adornato uses remix to superb
effect, slicing and dicing footage of George W. Bush, Tony Blair and assorted
cronies so that intelligible speech (a rarity for Bush at the best of
times) is replaced almost entirely with standing ovation after standing
ovation after standing ovation. The work cleverly exposes the propagandist
underpinnings of the occasion. The regal and ceremonial address becomes
a theatre of the absurd.
That’s the power of remix. To the normally passive consumer of mass
media (i.e., you and me), the technique can be quite potent because we
are simply unaccustomed to seeing things like news broadcasts manipulated,
and that’s partly why remix generates its share of criticism.
“It bothers me when critics against… remix video suggest it
is illegal, or not valid. Not only can I do this legally according to
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, article 2b, but it’s
also a very effective way to express my ideas, and my art, and requires
a great amount of skill, knowledge and talent to be effective.
“One of the biggest reasons I use mainstream media is because it
is constantly pumped in my face. I only have 50 channels on TV, and none
of them are what I want.”
“It [remix] makes for great satire, great critique… people
can get involved with my work cause I’m usually remixing topics
that are very prevalent in our society and using images from our culture
that they can recognize easily. My videos make people rethink the way
they watch and absorb TV. They bring issues to light that people may never
have known or seen before.”
“I’d like to see everyone happy all
the time, pleasant to each other, helpful, kind, and good spirited—a
Utopia. But, that’s not gonna happen… So I also like to freak
people out.”
|